Peran Strategis Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Keteraturan dan Keadilan Sosial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/green.v4i3.764Keywords:
Peran Hukum, Keteraturan Sosial, Keadilan Sosial, Akses Terhadap Keadilan, Penegakan HukumAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peran strategis hukum dalam mewujudkan keteraturan dan keadilan sosial melalui penguatan norma, institusi, akses terhadap keadilan, serta adaptasi terhadap perubahan sosial dan teknologi. Penelitian menggunakan metode studi kepustakaan dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan analisis hukum normatif. Data diperoleh dari artikel jurnal bereputasi, buku akademik, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan laporan penelitian yang relevan pada periode 2021–2026. Literatur ditelusuri melalui basis data Scopus dan Google Scholar, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis isi dan sintesis tematik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas hukum tidak hanya ditentukan oleh keberadaan peraturan tertulis, tetapi juga oleh kejelasan norma, konsistensi penegakan, independensi lembaga, akuntabilitas aparat, dan kesetaraan perlakuan di hadapan hukum. Keadilan prosedural terbukti berperan penting dalam meningkatkan legitimasi hukum dan kepatuhan sukarela masyarakat. Selain itu, perluasan akses bantuan hukum, penguatan literasi hukum, pengakuan terhadap pluralisme hukum, dan pemanfaatan teknologi digital menjadi faktor penting dalam mengurangi kesenjangan keadilan. Namun, digitalisasi juga menimbulkan risiko eksklusi, diskriminasi algoritmik, dan ketergantungan penanganan perkara pada viralitas media sosial. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa hukum harus ditempatkan sebagai instrumen yang tidak hanya menjaga ketertiban formal, tetapi juga menjamin keadilan substantif. Reformasi hukum perlu dilakukan secara terpadu melalui peningkatan kualitas regulasi, profesionalisme aparat, penguatan partisipasi masyarakat, perluasan layanan hukum, serta tata kelola teknologi yang transparan, inklusif, dan berorientasi pada perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Kebaruan kajian terletak pada pengembangan kerangka integratif yang menghubungkan dimensi normatif, institusional, sosial, dan adaptif dalam menilai keberhasilan hukum. Temuan ini memberikan dasar konseptual bagi perumusan kebijakan hukum yang membangun kepercayaan publik dan menjaga kohesi sosial secara berkelanjutan di Indonesia.
References
Alvarado-Vélez, J. A., Silva-Conde, D. I., Medina-Garcés, G. Y., & Mejía-Chávez, V. (2024). Justice for rural women: An exploratory analysis of institutions and mechanisms to access justice in Chimborazo, Ecuador. Heliyon, 10(6), Article e28234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28234
Anrango Narváez, D., Medina Sarmiento, J. E., & Del-Real, C. (2023). Why do people legitimize and cooperate with the police? Results of a randomized control trial on the effects of procedural justice in Quito, Ecuador. Crime Science, 12, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-023-00188-1
Beqiraj, J., & Moxham, L. (2022). Reconciling the theory and the practice of the rule of law in the European Union: Measuring the rule of law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14, 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00171-z
Dimyati, K., Nashir, H., Elviandri, E., Absori, A., Wardiono, K., & Budiono, A. (2021). Indonesia as a legal welfare state: A prophetic-transcendental basis. Heliyon, 7(8), Article e07865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865
Fung, E. H. C., & Dong, D. (2024). Access to civil justice as a social determinant of health: A legal epidemiological cross-sectional study. International Journal for Equity in Health, 23(1), Article 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02205-4
Islam, M. J., Suzuki, M., & Mazumder, N. (2024). Promoting access to justice in Bangladesh: Towards a hybrid justice model. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 77, Article 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100655
Kharisma, D. B. (2025). No viral no justice: Is it a principle of social justice? Study of viral cases on social media in Indonesia. Safer Communities, 24(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-07-2024-0037
Kokal, K., & de Souza, S. P. (2023). Ideas, narratives and experiences: A reflection on legal pluralism and the cause of justice in South Asia. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 55(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2023.2239589
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-Marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative legal research in Indonesia: Its origins and approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1–O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
Ramos-Maqueda, M., & Chen, D. L. (2025). The data revolution in justice. World Development, 186, Article 106834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106834
Sahin, N. M., Braga, A. A., & Apel, R. (2024). Procedural fairness, socioeconomic status, and driver perceptions of the police during traffic stops: A test of the invariance thesis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 20(4), 1175–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09575-9
Selçuk, S., Kurt Konca, N., & Kaya, S. (2025). AI-driven civil litigation: Navigating the right to a fair trial. Computer Law & Security Review, 57, Article 106136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106136
Skaaning, S.-E. (2025). A global, historical rule of law index. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 19(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-025-00625-2
Van Hall, M., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., van der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2023). Procedural justice, perceived legitimacy, and reoffending behavior: In police and court setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(12), 1874–1892. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231206833.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syafil Warman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








