Analisis Kompetensi Adaptif Guru Ditinjau dari Supervisi Akademik dan Motivasi Kerja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/green.v4i3.705Keywords:
teacher adaptive competence, academic supervision, work motivation, junior high school teachersAbstract
Perubahan kurikulum, perkembangan teknologi pembelajaran, dan keragaman kebutuhan peserta didik menuntut guru mampu menyesuaikan strategi, pengetahuan, dan perilaku profesionalnya secara berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kompetensi adaptif guru ditinjau dari supervisi akademik dan motivasi kerja. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain korelasional potong lintang. Seluruh 230 guru pada enam SMP Negeri di Kecamatan Marpoyan Damai, Kota Pekanbaru, dijadikan responden melalui teknik sampling jenuh. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan kuesioner skala Likert yang mengukur supervisi akademik, motivasi kerja, dan kompetensi adaptif guru, kemudian dianalisis melalui statistik deskriptif dan regresi linear berganda. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kompetensi adaptif guru berada pada kategori baik dengan rata-rata 4,1137. Supervisi akademik berhubungan positif dan signifikan dengan kompetensi adaptif (B = 0,235; β = 0,251; t = 2,866; p = 0,005), demikian pula motivasi kerja (B = 0,180; β = 0,204; t = 2,327; p = 0,021). Secara simultan, kedua variabel berhubungan signifikan dengan kompetensi adaptif (F = 24,863; p < 0,001) dan menjelaskan 18,0% variasinya. Temuan menegaskan perlunya supervisi yang dialogis dan berkelanjutan, disertai penguatan motivasi intrinsik guru. Karena deviasi dari linearitas juga signifikan pada output yang tersedia, hasil regresi ditafsirkan sebagai kecenderungan asosiasi dan bukan bukti kausalitas.
References
Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., & Martin, A. J. (2018). Teachers’ perceived autonomy support and adaptability: An investigation employing the job demands–resources model as relevant to workplace exhaustion, disengagement, and commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.015
Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2016). Adaptability: An important capacity for effective teachers. Educational Practice and Theory, 38(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/38.1.03
Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Teachers’ sense of adaptability: Examining links with perceived autonomy support, teachers’ psychological functioning, and students’ numeracy achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.003
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 23 (8th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2017). SuperVision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th ed.). Pearson.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
Loughland, T., & Alonzo, D. (2018). Teacher adaptive practices: Examining links with teacher self-efficacy, perceived autonomy support and teachers’ sense of adaptability. Educational Practice and Theory, 40(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/40.2.04
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
Republik Indonesia. (2005). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sokal, L., Eblie Trudel, L., & Babb, J. (2020). Canadian teachers’ attitudes toward change, efficacy, and burnout during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100016
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Febri Suzanni, Adolf Bastian, M. Firdaus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
