Pengembangan Integrated Learning Hub Berbasis LMS untuk Pembelajaran Tufting dan Desain Merchandise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/green.v4i4.997Keywords:
Integrated Learning Hub, LMS, tufting,, desain merchandise,, pepembelajaran berbasis studioAbstract
Pembelajaran tufting dan desain merchandise menghadapi keterbatasan akses peralatan, kebutuhan pengawasan, serta tingginya konsumsi material yang belum sepenuhnya terjawab melalui LMS konvensional. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan Integrated Learning Hub yang menghubungkan persiapan digital, praktik studio, dan orientasi pasar dalam mata kuliah Kewirausahaan Bahasa dan Seni. Rancangan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan design-based research melalui empat fase: diagnosis, perancangan arsitektur, pengembangan dan validasi, serta uji terap dan evaluasi. Konteks penelitian melibatkan 121 mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Malang, didukung dosen, instruktur, pelaku usaha, dan validator ahli. Pengembangan menghasilkan struktur pembelajaran 16 pertemuan dalam enam unit tematik, dilengkapi modul, bahan tayang, dan video demonstrasi. Arsitektur tiga simpul menempatkan kompetensi konseptual pada LMS, keterampilan haptik pada studio, serta kompetensi komersial pada proyek merchandise. Mekanisme readiness gate dirancang untuk memeriksa kesiapan prosedural dan keselamatan sebelum praktik. Model ini menawarkan kerangka integrasi pembelajaran yang berorientasi pada pengelolaan fasilitas dan pengalaman produksi; efektivitasnya masih memerlukan verifikasi melalui uji terap empiris.
References
Adetunji, R. O., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2024). Unlocking learning: Investigating the replayability of educational games. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2024, 5876780. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5876780
Arifmiboy, A., Iltavia, I., & Iswandi, I. (2024). Full online teacher training service scheme on improving pedagogical and professional competencies. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v9i1.4542
Assali, I., Delport, H. E., Andrews, M. W., & Azeez, N. D. (2023). A blended model of interior design studio practice due to COVID-19. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128478.3
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Farrell, M., Martin, M., Renkl, A., Rieß, W., Könings, K. D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Seidel, T. (2022). An epistemic network approach to teacher students' professional vision in tutoring video analysis. Frontiers in Education, 7, 805422. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.805422
Febrianda, R., Ariyani, L., Hermawati, W., Aminullah, E., & Dinaseviani, A. (2025). Model of entrepreneurship and digital technology in responding to green and non-green innovation: Case study of batik SMEs in Indonesia. Sustainable Development, 33(4), 5904–5918. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3444
González-Martínez, P., García-Pérez-de-Lema, D., Castillo-Vergara, M., & Hansen, P. B. (2023). Determinants and performance of the quadruple helix model and the mediating role of civil society. Technology in Society, 75, 102358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102358
Houston, N., Manrique, F., Mo, S., Ruoqian, W., Wenjing, J., & Yuting, L. (2025). Designing an effective educational toy: Incorporating design-thinking in the design classroom. Discover Education, 4, 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00402-z
Hu, dkk. (2025). Bridging the macro, meso and micro levels of designer–artisan co-design: Case studies of value co-creation within Chinese textile crafts. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70072
Kamalipour, H., & Peimani, N. (2022). Learning and teaching urban design through design studio pedagogy: A blended studio on transit urbanism. Education Sciences, 12(10), 712. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100712
Kemenparekraf. (2024, 12 Agustus). Siaran pers: Nilai tambah ekonomi kreatif capai 55,65 persen dari target tahun 2024. Kementerian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif Republik Indonesia. https://kemenparekraf.go.id/berita/siaran-pers-nilai-tambah-ekonomi-kreatif-capai-5565-persen-dari-target-tahun-2024
Kementerian Ekonomi Kreatif. (2025, 23 Desember). Capaian gemilang 2025: Ekonomi kreatif kini jadi tambang baru nasional [Laporan Ekraf Annual Report 2025, sebagaimana diberitakan Bisnis.com]. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20251223/9/1939165/capaian-gemilang-2025-ekonomi-kreatif-kini-jadi-tambang-baru-nasional
Lambert, C., Ogilvie, M., & Meek, S. (2026). Students' perspectives on authentic assessment: An experiential learning framework for work-readiness and employability. Journal of Experiential Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259261425680
Liu, Y., Chen, M., & Wang, Q. (2022). The impact of symmetry design of intangible cultural heritage souvenir on tourists' aesthetic pleasure. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 987716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987716
Michalsky, T. (2021). Integrating video analysis of teacher and student behaviors to promote preservice teachers' teaching meta-strategic knowledge. Metacognition and Learning, 16, 595–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09251-7
Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: Toward a research agenda. R&D Management, 48(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12228
Noya, S., Taneo, S. Y. M., & Melany. (2023). Triple helix innovation ecosystem: The role of small and medium enterprises community in enhancing performance. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 27(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v27i1.1759
Pang, J., & Sunwoo, J. (2021). Changes in pre-service teachers' noticing through an elementary mathematics methods course combining theory and practice. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 31(3), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2021.31.3.231
Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2022). The future of design studio education: Student experience and perception of blended learning and teaching during the global pandemic. Education Sciences, 12(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020140
Raharjo, K., Afrianty, T. W., & Prakasa, Y. (2024). Digital literacy and business transformation: Social-cognitive learning perspectives in small business enterprises. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2376282. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2376282
Schmalenbach, C., & Ashouri, C. (2025). Design-based research — A framework for participation and action in educational research. Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447251387997
Shalihah, R., & Syafryadin, S. (2023). In-service ELT teachers' perception on Learning Management System (LMS) implementation during Teacher Educational Education Program (PPG). Edu-Ling: Journal of English Education and Linguistics, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.32663/edu-ling.v6i2.3343
Shen, H., & Lai, I. K. W. (2022). Souvenirs: A systematic literature review (1981–2020) and research agenda. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221106734
Süner-Pla-Cerdà, S., Öztürk, E., & Ünlü, C. (2024). Towards an integrative model of blended design studios: A multiple case study across architecture, design and planning education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 2005–2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12873-y
Ten Holter, C. (2022). Participatory design: Lessons and directions for responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 9(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2041801
Wang, B., Ji, T., & He, R. (2023). Empowerment or disempowerment: The (dis)empowering processes and outcomes of co-designing with rural craftspeople. Sustainability, 15(5), 4468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054468
Zhu, Q., Rahman, R., Alli, H., & Effendi, R. A. A. R. A. (2023). Souvenirs development related to cultural heritage: A thematic review. Sustainability, 15(4), 2918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042918
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdul Rahman Prasetyo, Shirly Rizki Kusumaningrum, Fikri Aulia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
